A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Just some years in the past, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming endeavor, demanding individuals to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case law search opportunities, and many sources offer free access to case law.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined through the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified from the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Generally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including Individuals in obvious violation of recognized case regulation) into the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is often pricey and difficult to acquire.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for that accused who intentionally murdered the target.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the lessen courts.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's nicely established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil here servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.